02
Sep
12

Out of this World

My September column in Mechanical Engineering magazine.

Last month I was invited to a midnight party that was out of this world.

NASA was hosting the party—a public vigil for the landing of the rover Curiosity on the surface of Mars—at the iconic Times Square site in New York City where revelers wait for the year to change every December 31.

I decided to skip the public celebration but stayed up until the wee hours, nonetheless, to watch the event live online at home. I was not the only one who tuned in, as NASA’s websites ultimately crashed due to the high volume of overnight space gawkers.

And why wouldn’t people tune in? The 10-year project, with a price tag of $2.5 billion, featured an impossibly complex rover and landing system. If you’re not familiar with it, see the video here.

Still, this project hasn’t garnered the type of buzz this year’s Olympics enjoyed. Maybe there’s no gee-whiz left in us anymore and we’ve grown used to seeing things we never thought we would see, but—putting politics and finance aside—landing a rover the size of a car on Mars is a spectacular engineering feat.

If the public interest surrounding this remarkable achievement was subdued, the mood among engineers and scientists at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory was not. When Curiosity landed, they were whooping it up as though their own kin had won an Olympic medal.

In fact, mechanical engineer Adam Steltzner—who led the team that designed the system and has become the prominent face of the project—said he felt the project has  become like nurturing the development of a child.

Steltzner, a former rocker, has become a bit of a celebrity in his own right. He is comfortable in front of the media, sports an Elvis haircut, and has pierced ears. The Bay Area native told National Public Radio a couple of days before Curiosity landed that engineering gave him the “opportunity to be gainfully employed, really understanding my world with these laws and equations that govern it.” He’s become so popular, in some circles, that there’s an active blog discussion on whether Steltzner is truly a hipster or not—some claim his perfectly coiffed hair disqualifies him.

Supporters of planetary exploration argue strongly that Curiosity represents more than a search for any life Mars might harbor; but that it also signals to the rest of the world that U.S. engineering is thriving. As of this writing, Curiosity was successfully sending back signals from Mars.

In her thought-provoking essay in this issue on the basic human right to access technology, Jessica Wyndham, who is director of the Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights, and Law Program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said, “Engineers often operate beyond the borders of their own communities, cultures, and languages to bring change.”

Wyndham is focused on the rights of people living in rural areas and developing countries to access state-of-the-art technology. Engineers working at the Jet Propulsion Lab will tell you that Curiosity is, in its own right, an important tool to give engineers on Earth access to insights that will lead to breakthrough technologies. Technology, they say, that will lead to a better way of life, on Earth, for all. 


4 Responses to “Out of this World”


  1. September 29, 2012 at 5:43 am

    hi!,I love your writing very a lot! proportion we keep in touch more approximately your article on
    AOL? I need a specialist on this area to solve my problem.
    Maybe that’s you! Looking ahead to peer you.

  2. August 22, 2014 at 3:28 am

    The roof deck acts as a guide to the flowing water which
    glides down to the house structure. There are lots of roofers in any sort of given area.
    If there are only certain areas which might be needing attention, it’s going to be carried out by eliminating that old
    and replacing it with new layers and coating.

  3. August 28, 2014 at 8:05 am

    Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for info about
    this subject for a while and yours is the best I have discovered till now.
    However, what about the conclusion? Are you certain about the source?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


The Editor

John G. Falcioni is Editor-in-Chief of Mechanical Engineering magazine, the flagship publication of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

September 2012
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Twitter from John Falcioni

Twitter from Engineering for Change


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers

%d bloggers like this: